Northeastern Amerindian Canoes: Peabody Museum #8

As the final installment in the series, let's look now at boat-related exhibits of Northeastern American Indian cultures at Harvard University's Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. Earlier posts sampled the Peabody's exhibits of Baffinland Inuit, Aleut, other Alaskan Eskimo, and Chinook, Coast Salish, et al, and other Pacific Northwest cultures, a large stitch-planked monohull canoe from the Solomon Islands, and items from several cultures of Oceania.)

Detail of a diorama depicting American Indian culture of Southern New England in late 17th and 18th centuries. The paper birch rarely grows to adequate canoe-building size in Southern New England. Although Amerindians further north would trade sheets of canoe bark with Southern New England tribes, the dugout was the region's most common, and only indigenous, watercraft. Rectilinear lines as shown were the norm. In hollowing the hull, the top surface would be burnt to a char with a small, carefully regulated fire, then adzes with stone or shell blades were used to chip and scrap away the charred material. Although dugout canoes are often thought to have been heavy and awkward affairs, one can see from the model that the sides were hewn to a thinness that would make the canoes reasonable agile and capable of being portaged when necessary. (Click any image to enlarge.)

Blade of an Eastern Algonkian canoe paddle, collected prior to 1899. From the display card: "The blade of this elaborately decorated paddle is painted green. The double-curve design was executed by removing the paint while it was still wet. The stepped motif and crosshatching are suggestive of Penobscot or Passamaquoddy manufacture. The handle exhibits graceful carving and shows much indication of use." The Penobscot people lived (and still live) in Maine; the Passamadquoddy in Maine and New Brunswick. [Addition 1/27/14: further discussion of this paddle appears on Murat's excellent blog Paddle Making (and Other Canoe Stuff).] 

Shaft and handle of the above paddle. 

A model of a "crooked" canoe from the Montagnais people of eastern Canada, made around 1852. The "crooked" name derives from the sharply rockered bottom, designed for quick maneuvering on tight and rocky streams.

Another Passamaquoddy canoe model, but of a different style, and collected in the early 19th century. The double-curve design on the bark is executed by scraping away one layer of the bark. When applied to full-size canoes, such decoration was usually confined to the ends and topside areas amidships, and not below the waterline as was done on the model.  

A model Micmac sea canoe, made in 1904. The double-curved gunwales raise the sheer amidships, making the boat drier in ocean waves, while the lower sheer toward the ends allowed easier paddling. 

Eastern Algonkian canoe model, collected in 1794 and described as "very accurate." From the display card: "Although originally attributed to the Micmac, the form of this canoe is suggestive of Maliseet, Passamaquoddy, or Penobscot manufacture [all Maine tribes; ed.]. the flared ends are of a very early style. Note that the thwarts are carved and the seams have rod ochre applied over pitch."

Canoe model built in 1904. From the display card: "The unusual ends make attribution difficult. The bottom profile is slightly concave, or 'hogged,' as is typical of northwestern canoe types, but the U-shaped end treatment is not characteristic of that area in general."

Related Posts:

Tweet

INTERESTING SAILBOATS / BLOG RULES / HELLO!!!

What's about and previous story:

I started a thread on sailnet:
http://www.sailnet.com/forums/boat-review-purchase-forum/62341-interesting-sailboats.html
that have become more of a popular blog then a thread. With the help of some few contributors (that I hope will join me here) in few years the thread become very popular with about 1500 hits a day and more than 1 million 300 thousand hits in few years.

Only a miracle and interested civil forum members allowed that something with a form of a blog could be held on a public forum but things had changed and what was good fun on a very nice ambiance become disagreeable with an hostile environment created by few. No fun anymore so I will give up and I will continue it on a true Blog, as open as possible but with full control in what regard rude behavior and direction.

Like on the previous thread with the same name, it is all about sailboats, sailors, cruisers, racers, boat design and sea stories.

The objective is to having fun and provide a good read (and nice videos) to all that like sailing but also to provide information that will allow a better understanding regarding the different  types of boats on the market, understanding that I hope will contribute for a more adequate choice regarding personal needs, tastes and cruising or racing life style.

It will be a seasonal blog since I cruise about 4 months in a year so, like the thread, this will be mostly an Autumn and winter Blog with few posts on Spring and Summer. I hope you all enjoy it and I would like you all to participate

I had a great offer from a German "member"of this blog in what regards improving it. Contrary to me he is a Pro and knows all about it, while I know almost nothing, so it can only get better ;-). I will not name it (even if I want to) because I don't know if he wants to, but I will hope that from that collaboration all problems in what regards easy accessible information hill be dealt with.

The idea is to divide the contents of this blog in several chapters with easy access: One for the current discussion and new posts, one for new boats presentation and boat tests, other for boat design, another for cruising, another for racing, another about great contemporary NAs and their work. The idea is presenting all content on the current "chapter" and then after some time archive everything under the different chapters, eventually deleting less relevant posts or restructuring them joining its content with others. Like a giant book on sailboats with chapters but a never ending one.

So, I am open to ideas regarding the best format for this blog. You can post them as comments to this post (I will not re-post them but that way they would be seen by all and could induce some discussion) or to my mail : pernao.paulo@gmail.com

 On the previous thread we had all this but even I had difficulty in finding relevant information from older posts, I mean to find them. One thing I absolutely want to maintain and even increase is the collaborative trend that existed already on the old thread regarding content, with many interesting information coming from other contributors. Even if not contributing with very relevant information it is important for me to hear about you all and to maintain that conviviality. For that till we manage a better system I will re-post your comments on the the current posts for all to see and share and if they are just simply to say hello and little more I will delete them on the Archive later (and they will remain as comments on the blog).

Also in what regards racing or boats presentations, when more complete information is presented, less relevant information will be deleted trying to maintain a much richer, easily available and denser content.

BLOG RULES

I found out first the inconvenient of a Blog over a thread; now I am discovering the advantages and I want to maximize them. So, some rules to better communication and the blog:

1- Just post the comments on the right place (instead of on the last post) regarding the post you want to comment. I was afraid not to see all comments but I receive a mail alerting me to them so no problem with missing them.

2-Regarding your comments they can be of 2 types: Just a simple comment, kind of: I like it or I don't like it, or something that can be viewed as something more relevant regarding the discussion on the subject.

On the first case the comment will stay there, visible to all, if it is a contribution it will be posted by me on the main body and erased as a comment on the post.

3- After some weeks the comment or comments about a subject will be deleted as a single post and integrated on the main body of the post they were commenting. 

The big advantage has to do with reuniting all relevant information about a single subject on a single post. That gives me more work but it will work nicely and will make the reading and searching on the blog much easier. To see what I mean go to the post on the SO 349 (at the beginning) and have a look. That post reunites already all discussion about that boat that was dispersed by several posts.

Thanks to all for your help, support and incentive. I wait for your ideas and contributions to be able to make a better Blog.

HELLO! 

Hi Everybody and glad to have you all on this, I mean the ones that I did not yet re-posted, Dias de playa (Pedro) Edward3 (mylar), Thomas, TK, Laurent, Anders, Eric, Mr Pelicano, Opc, Florian and all the others.

 This is going to be a odd blog :-). I intend to have you all (and the ones that will join us) participating and contributing and for that I will re-post your contributes on the main blog, not as a comment but as a content. It will be not very different than what we had on sailnet, except here I can assure to all that we will have a very nice ambiance no matter different opinions.

It may take sometime but if the contribution is relevant I well re-post it for discussion. If it is just a comment, it will remain on comments.

If someone has some question regarding a particular boat or something that may be of interest or would like to see debated, just post it on the last post as a comment and I will re-post it (if I find it of general interest) or at least I will reply as a comment.

Best regards to all,

Paulo

Related Posts:

Tweet

From Pacific Islands: Peabody Museum #7

Let's look at some more maritime-related objects from several Pacific cultures on display at Harvard University's Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. (Earlier posts in this series on the Peabody looked at Baffinland Inuit, Aleut, other Alaskan Eskimo, and Chinook, Coast Salish, et al, other Pacific Northwest exhibits, and a large stitch-planked monohull canoe from the Solomon Islands.)

This canoe model from New Zealand was collected prior to 1850. Its origin is probably Maori. The base of the hull appears to be carved from a single log, as would have been the real canoe that it represented. It measures approx. 108" LOA. (Click any image to enlarge.)

Elaborately carved stern decoration on the Maori canoe model. 

Bow decoration on the same model. The carved washstrakes are stitched to the dugout hull, and a black half-round batten is captured by the stitches. On a real canoe, some kind of vegetable fiber and mastic would have been placed beneath the batten to make the seam watertight.

The museum has an impressive display of adzes from various Pacific cultures, most with stone blades. The adze is the primary tool for dugout canoe construction.

This side-hafted adze from the Carolina Islands has a blade of sea-turtle bone and bindings of twisted coconut fiber.

This adze from Kirapuno, New Guinea, has a reversible stone blade held in place with nicely woven rattan binding.

Navigation chart from the Marshall Islands, made of the midribs of palm leaves, shells, and hibiscus and banana fibers.

Collected prior to 1903, this model Philippine double-outrigger sailing canoe has a squaresail rig, a dugout base and trifurcated ends, with two of the horns at each end turned up sharply. The outrigger floats are attached directly to the straight outrigger booms, placing the floats quite high -- possibly above the load waterline.

The struts on this Hawaiian double canoe model (wa'a kaulua) curve up between the hulls before passing through the washstrakes just above the gunwales of the dugout bases. Naturally-grown, curved timbers were used on real canoes. The curvature raises the struts above some splashing waves.

The unadorned simplicity of this single-outrigger Hawaiian paddling canoe model clearly identifies it as a workboat for inshore fishing and/or transportation.  

Whereas the two previous canoe models from Hawaii were representational, this delicately carved canoe-shaped effigy vessel from Indonesia probably had a ceremonial purpose. 

Composite fishhook of bone, fiber and wood. The display card says it's from the "Sandwich Islands": one wonders why the museum chose to use this antiquated name for Hawaii. A leader is bound to the shank of the hook, the bindings tightened by an inserted wooden wedge.

Related Posts:

Tweet

Solomon Islands Canoe: Peabody Museum #6

Here's an interesting canoe from the Solomon Islands in Melanesia, on display at Harvard University's Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. The display card says it was given to the museum in 1898, but provides no other details, so we'll just look at the photos and make what comments we can. (Earlier posts in this series on the Peabody looked at Baffinland Inuit, Aleut, other Alaskan Eskimo, and Chinook, Coast Salish, et al, and other Pacific Northwest exhibits.)

Starting at what we believe is the stern: the canoe is a sewn-plank monohull. The base is a keel-plank, laid on the flat, to which garboards and a second layer of strakes are added. The strakes amidships are lower than those at the ends. Very tall decorations added at both ends. The plank seams are sealed with black mastic, probably derived from the putty nut (Parinarium laurinum). Elaborate decorations under the stem/stern indicate a ceremonial function, as they would be highly impractical for a working boat. (Click any image to enlarge.)

The profile shows the sharp break between the amidship strakes and the end strakes, and the extreme height of the bow and stern decorations. The hull has a great deal of rocker, continuous from bow to stern. The general shape is that of a war or "headhunting" canoe, although headhunting canoes were commonly even more elaborately decorated. They could reach 55' LOA and hold up to 35 men, but this example is probably 25-30'.

Painted decorations near the stern. The object at the left appears to be a bird (facing right). I can't make a guess about the object to the right. The gunwale has small, detailed, chip-carved decoration. Cracks can be seen in the black caulking material. Canoes were typically stored in canoe houses to protect and maintain the sealant as long as possible.

Amidships on both sides are two "medallions" made of mastic embedded with pieces of shell or mother of pearl at the garboard/upper strake seam. Also shown is a very long, narrow, pointed paddle with a T-grip.

Carved decoration on the bow extension: a dog?.

Another detail near the bow. showing plank seams and decorations. The white decoration under the keel appears to be mother-of-pearl.

Throughout most of Oceania, hulls this narrow were usually supported by outriggers. But in the Solomons, monohulls were common. 

In addition to being lashed to each other with (probably discontinuous) stitches, the planks were lashed on the inside to curved frames of complex shape. The thinness of the planks is apparent from this perspective.

A few years ago, In the Boatshed reported on the restoration of a canoe of similar type, size and age. 

Related Posts:

Tweet